Case Study #3: Let’s get Tom to Latin America!

Latin_America_(orthographic_projection)

Image courtesy of Wikipedia

I wasn’t planning two Case Studies this close together. Really. But then Tom dropped this note in my lap (actually on Ask jlcollinsnh) and it proved irresistible on several fronts:

–It provides a chance to make a key point about F-You Money:

Unlike the amount needed for full financial independence (FI) and retiring, all that is needed is enough to embolden you to explore new and interesting options.

–It involves long-term international travel.

–It provides a great illustration of how to execute my 10-year plan without being stuck as an office drone.

–It provides a chance to illustrate how your F-You Money can grow to make you FI even while you’re off having adventures.

Let’s take a look at Tom’s situation, plans and questions:

Dear jlcollinsnh:

Help a Hoarder Go Back to School!

Hi! I’m a huge fan of your site. It’s nice to see your investing optimism amid all the doom and gloom of the mass media. Anyway, I’d love your advice on my current situation.

I’m currently working in a high paying job. It’s as life sucking as can be but the pay is amazing. At the end of this year, my contract will end and I’ll have amassed $250k in a checking account. Foolish, I know. It was my dumb “let’s try to time the market phase,” but I’ve grown out of it. You’ve shown me the light!

After this job ends, I plan to study in Latin America (I’m from the US) for five years. During these five years, I’ll have no income and expect to spend $16k a year, which is a firm, inflexible requirement. Once I graduate, I plan to permanently relocate and work in Latin America and start savings again, albeit at a much more modest rate than now. I’d then eventually like to retire early – perhaps around the age of 40.

Here are some stats:
Age: 28

Liabilities: $0.

Assets Upon Getting Laid Off and Going to School: $250k in checking, $17.5k in a Vanguard small cap 401k

Cost of School (2014-2018): $16k/year x 5 years = $80k

Savings Once Back in the Workforce (2019-2024?): $6k/year in savings (low salary but worthwhile profession)

Retirement Goal: (2025/age 40-ish): $450k in investments (18k/year withdrawal rate)

As I’m now an enlightened reader, I’m ready and excited to invest and have my money work for me. How would you suggest investing?

Note: I can only invest in taxable accounts, since I’ve already maxed out my Vanguard small cap 401k for the year and I am not interested in a Roth IRA as I plan to be in a low tax bracket during early retirement.

My current investment ideas include:

1. Keep the 80k needed for school low risk and highly liquid (high-interest checking and CDs?) and invest the remaining funds (170k) in the VTSAX, which I wouldn’t touch for at least 10 years. I’ll stay strong!

Pro: I’m guaranteed to not have to touch my VTSAX fund since I’ll have cold, hard cash to pay for school.

Con: I stupidly have too much cash sitting around.

2.. Take the entire 250k and invest in one of Vanguard’s conservative balanced funds, such as the Target Retirement Income Fund, or Lifegrowth Funds, or slightly more aggressive VBIAX and make monthly withdrawals as I go through school.

Pro: An excessive amount of cash isn’t sitting around doing nothing

Con: I risk having to make my aggressive 6.4% withdrawal rate during a possible down market during my time in school.

What do you think? I’m dealing with two different time horizon heres, Short term 1-5 years for school and medium term 10-15 years for early retirement.

Keep up the great work on the blog!!

Best,

Tom

croc feeding

Tom’s not been foolish. This guy, however….

Courtesy of http://www.break.com

Welcome Tom…

…and thanks for the very interesting scenario! Let’s get started with some general observations:

Don’t think of having held cash as having been foolish. Think of it as having been patient in figuring out what you needed to know about investing before making your move.

Looking at the two options you lay out, I’d say you’ve used your investment research time well.

Too often people rush into buying individual stocks or chasing “star” fund managers without understanding the landscape and how vanishingly difficult those paths are. Now that’s foolish.

Nothing at all wrong with holding your cash until you are sure about what you plan to do. This is for the long-term, after all. Time spent getting it right is time well spent. This includes time spent being sure you are mentally tough enough for the wild ride. Sounds like you are.

Speaking of being mentally tough, congratulations on being tough enough to:

  • stick out your high-paying sucky job long enough to set the stage for your adventure.
  • avoid the lifestyle inflation that could have trapped you in that job.
  • avoid taking on debt that would have made those chains even stouter.

All these are key parts of my ten-year plan linked to above. At age 28 you’ve managed to position yourself beautifully.

So let’s turn our attention to your two investment ideas and play with this cool Compound Interest Calculator I cribbed from Johnny Moneyseed’s recent post From employment to retirement in 7 years.

Scenario #1.

Actually, including the 17.5k you have in your 401k you are heading to Latin America with 267.5k.

If we pull the 80k you’ll need for the next five years into cash that leaves 187.5k to invest.

The 17.5 in the 401k Vanguard Small Cap Index fund is just fine left there for now. We’ll come back to it later. The rest — 170k — we’ll drop into VTSAX.

Now it gets fun, and a bit tricky.

Over time, the market returns somewhere between 8-12%. But with a five year time horizon, your actual results could range much higher. Or lower. I’m not overly concerned about this as your plan is to continue to keep this money invested and growing. So for the sake of this conversation, let’s run the numbers three ways. You’d end with:

  • $239,303 at a somewhat pessimistic 5%, but still offsetting 51.5k of the 80k you will have spent. Not bad.
  • $275,499 at a fairly modest historical return of 8%, more than replacing the 80k you will have spent. The beauty of money working for you illustrated!
  • $330,439 at an aggressive historical return of 12%, making you wealthier than when you started. Woo Hoo!

Now, what happens when you have been back working and adding that annual 6k from 2019 to 2024? Dropping each of the ending numbers from above in to our calculator, by 2024 you’d have:

  • $340,229 @ the 5% projection
  • $386,426 @ the 8% projection
  • $456,545 @ the 12% projection

As you can see, the bad news is that only one of these projections gets you to your 450k goal. The good news is you are now looking at a 10 year time horizon and the further out you go the more likely you are to get to the higher return levels.

So, even pulling the entire 80k you’ll be spending into cash up front gets you some pretty impressive potential results.

Scenario #2.

Keeping all the money fully invested, pulling it only as needed.

Since you are starting with 267.5k and you’ll be withdrawing 16k per year, you have a 6% withdrawal rate. If you haven’t already, now I’m going to send you over to give my post on withdrawal rates a read.

What you’ll see is that, while starting to push the envelope, 6% is not completely unreasonable. Especially given a bit of luck, the short time you’ll be doing it and the fact that, unlike somebody say 65 or so, you’ll have the ability to work your way thru it if the market turns against you.

Taking a look at the Trinity Study Update I referenced in that post, you’ll see what makes these academic withdrawal studies tricky is when they account for inflation over 30 years. Tough bar.

Comparing charts 3 & 4 you can see this clearly. Since it also designed to examine extended periods of 15 years or more, you need to be careful extrapolating to your 5-10 time frame. As we’ve discussed, the shorter the time frame the more likely your returns are to be outside the norm. For better or worse.

Understanding that, it is still instructive to look at chart #3 and the 15 year results @ 6%. Notice that 100% stocks gives the best results and that those results diminish the more bonds you add. Of course, 100% stocks will also magnify the “outside the norm” dynamic described in the paragraph above.

So now, hopefully, you can see I’ve set up a framework for your decision.

If you go with your scenario #1, you’ll get a good result but one likely to leave you a bit more work to do beyond 2024 before hitting your 450k goal.

Go with your scenario #2 and you’ll keep more money working (and at risk) and greatly improve your chances of being at 450k or more by 2024, but with a greater risk of a larger gap should the market move against you for an extended period. Go with a 100% stock portfolio version and you’ll magnify this effect.

So you’ll also need to decide between the idea of the balanced funds you mentioned or 100% stocks in VTSAX. It really depends on your temperament and goals. Personally, I’d be willing to risk having to work a bit longer against the potential of having more when I wrap it up in 2024. But that’s me.

girls-whispering

Psst. He might go for an option #2 version.

Not surprisingly, by extension, I’d go with one of the #2 versions. I’d set it up with Vanguard to transfer $1333 each month to my checking account and I’d never even glance at the funds while I was kicking it in Latin America.

As for a Roth, even though you plan to be in a low tax bracket, don’t be too quick to dismiss funding one. Things could change and you can always withdraw all your contributions tax and penalty free. Only the money it earns need be left in place, growing forever tax-free. It may never benefit you to the max, but it will benefit you. And there is no reason not to do it.

Ok, now back to that 401k. As soon as you are in your first year of no income, I’d roll this into a Vanguard Roth IRA. I’d also move it to VTSAX at this point, although if you are especially fond of the Small Cap Index fund that’s fine too.

While technically a taxable event, with no other income, at this amount the rollover should be tax-free. Once there it will grow tax-free forever.

Since for those first five years you won’t have income you won’t be able to add to it. But in 2019 when you start earning again, fund the Roth fully each year.*(See addendum #1) In fact, this is where most (up to the max allowed by law) of your planned savings in those years should go. Especially since it sounds like your income will be low enough not to need the immediate tax deduction.

There you have it. You are in a great position to pursue your new adventures while your money does the heavy lifting for you going forward!

What will you be studying and where exactly?

Travel safe and keep us posted!

 

*Addendum #1:

In the comments below reader Andres schooled me on the Foreign Income Exclusion for US expats and its effect on Roth IRA contributions. Here is our conversation…

Andrés:

One small wrinkle I’ve learned from living abroad: unless Tom makes more than the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (which will be $97,600 for 2013 and is indexed to increase with inflation) he won’t be able to contribute to his Roth IRA if he is living and working full-time outside of the United States. However, he will be able to contribute to his taxable brokerage accounts as normal.

My reply:

Thanks Andrés…

Great input and something I didn’t know.

It got me doing a bit of research and I’d like to expand a bit on your comment.

The IRS says you can contribute to a Roth IRA if, in 2013 you

1. received taxable compensation during the year, and
2. your modified Adjusted Gross Income is less than certain levels which are detailed here:
http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Amount-of-Roth-IRA-Contributions-That-You-Can-Make-For-2013

Since the first $97,600 of foreign income is excluded, unless you make more than this you wouldn’t meet the income qualification.

However, in determining your income limit, this excludable income is added back in.

For a single taxpayer like Tom the income limit for a Roth IRA starts at 112k and phases out thru 127k. That is between 112k and 127k you can fund part of a Roth.

So, if Tom makes $97,600 or less: No Roth. Since the income is excluded, he doesn’t meet the earned income test.

If Tom makes over 127k: No Roth. He is over the income limit.

If Tom makes 100k, he could contribute $2400 to his Roth. That is his total adjusted gross income of 100k – the 97.6k exclusion = 2.4k

If Tom were to make between 103.1k (97.6k + 5.5k) and 112k he’ll be able to fully fund his Roth at the allowed $5500. Once over 112k the amount allowed gets steadily reduced until it is gone completely over 127k.

Whew!

And this is why I hate writing about tax stuff! :)

Addendum 2:

Also from the comments below is this great strategy presented by Jay Jay. Tom should definitely do this.

Thanks Jay Jay!

Jay Jay:

I’ve been reading your blog for quite some time (love it, and thanks for doing it!), but this is the first time I’ve felt I might possibly add some insight.

Since Tom’s income will be so low, his dividends and capital gains should be tax-free (assuming his ex-patriot status doesn’t impact that) up to $32k or more, depending on deductions and exemptions.

I know you usually recommend a “set it and forget it” approach to index fund investing, but it might make sense in Tom’s case to consider occasionally selling off his fund if it has experienced some gains, and then immediately buying back into it. He would of course need to calculate what amount he could sell which would still keep him in the 0% cap gain tax bracket. If he remains in a 0% tax bracket, all he’s lost is his transaction costs.

This is sort of the opposite of a wash sale. Instead of locking in a loss, you are locking in a tax-free capital gain. It also re-establishes the cost basis, so if he ends up in a higher bracket in the future, his capital gains will be less than if he hadn’t made the sale/repurchase. As far as I am aware, there is no 30 day limit for sales/repurchases that involve a gain.

My additional considerations:

Because Tom will be using Vanguard funds he need not even worry about transaction costs, which Jay Jay rightly points out could be a consideration in other scenarios.

However, when using Vanguard funds there is this glitch:

“If you sell or exchange shares of a Vanguard fund, you will not be permitted to buy or exchange back into the same fund, in the same account, within 60 calendar days.”

The easy way around this is to exchange from VTSAX to VFIAX (S&P 500 index fund) and back to VTSAX after 60 days. While VTSAX slightly out performs VFIAX over time, for short periods either could win making this an non-issue. In fact, I’d be comfortable enough with VFIAX to say just leave the funds there until you are ready to harvest the profits again.


 More Case Studies

Subscribe to JL’s Newsletter

Important Resources

  • Talent Stacker is a resource that I learned about through my work with Jonathan and Brad at ChooseFI, and first heard about Salesforce as a career option in an episode where they featured Bradley Rice on the Podcast. In that episode, Bradley shared how he reached FI quickly thanks to his huge paychecks and discipline in keeping his expenses low. Jonathan teamed up with Bradley to build Talent Stacker, and they have helped more than 1,000 students from all walks of life complete the program and land jobs like clockwork, earning double or even triple their old salaries using a Salesforce certification to break into a no-code tech career.
  • Credit Cards are like chain saws. Incredibly useful. Incredibly dangerous. Resolve to pay in full each month and never carry a balance. Do that and they can be great tools. Here are some of the very best for travel hacking, cash back and small business rewards.
  • Empower is a free tool to manage and evaluate your investments. With great visuals you can track your net worth, asset allocation, and portfolio performance, including costs. At a glance you'll see what's working and what you might want to change. Here's my full review.
  • Betterment is my recommendation for hands-off investors who prefer a DIFM (Do It For Me) approach. It is also a great tool for reaching short-term savings goals. Here is my Betterment Review
  • NewRetirement offers cool tools to help guide you in answering the question: Do I have enough money to retire? And getting started is free. Sign up and you will be offered two paths into their retirement planner. I was also on their podcast and you can check that out here:Video version, Podcast version.
  • Tuft & Needle (T&N) helps me sleep at night. They are a very cool company with a great product. Here’s my review of what we are currently sleeping on: Our Walnut Frame and Mint Mattress.
  • Vanguard.com

Comments

  1. Tara says

    Sounds kinda optimistic… you think $450,000 is going to last for 40-50 years at 4% withdrawal? If that’s true, I can quit tomorrow….

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Hi Tara….

      The short answer is “yes.”

      The odds and research favor it. And the Trinity Study referenced sets a very high bar for that 4%: The withdrawals are adjusted for inflation every year regardless of market conditions.

      This is covered in some detail in the post linked to above (https://jlcollinsnh.com/2012/12/07/stocks-part-xiii-withdrawal-rates-how-much-can-i-spend-anyway/) and in the comments that follow it. You might be especially interested in the conversation with Naomi.

      But, as that post ends:
      “4% is only a guide. Sensible flexibility is what provides security.”

  2. Tara says

    Thanks for that response – I read an interesting article from Wade Pfau about sequence of returns risk. Basically he says that if you withdraw a flat 3-4 percent of the remaining balance of the portfolio each year, there is no sequence of returns risk and you won’t run out of money. Woot! I think my fear is just that it sounds too good to be true… I am only 47 and afraid to pull the plug on my job, as much as I would like to. I don’t want to be 60 and running out of money… I will probably work for a couple more years to pad the nest, unless I get really brave. 🙂

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Pfau does great research and I’m a fan of that concept. In fact, it is what I do myself.

      Of course it requires be flexible enough to adjust spending in the down years, but that’s what we’d all do in the face of a salary cut or job loss in our working days, right?

      There is nothing wrong with working a few extra years to pad your nest. Certainly if 4% of what you have now just barely gets you by you’ll want to do just that.

      But be careful fear alone is not what keeps you in a job you’d be best off leaving.

      It is always a balance of needs, wants and time.

      What has always be striking to me in the Trinity study, is not that on rare occasions the 4% rule fails. It is that in the vast majority of cases it not only succeeds, it leaves people with incredible amounts of money. At this with that whole adjusting for inflation bar.

      Great for the heirs, but not worth staying in a miserable job.

      Good luck and I hope to hear more from you.

    • Prob8 says

      Tara – If I understand your comment, you already have enough to live on a 4% withdrawal rate and you are miserable at your job. I also take it that you are not convinced a 4% withdrawal rate is sustainable. In that case, I think it’s reasonable to save a bit more money. After all, withdrawal rates are never a sure thing. Flexibility and a reasonable safety margin are big pieces of the puzzle.

      Having said that, I would not discount the ill effects of being stressed at a job you hate. Perhaps you can ease your mind with picking up part-time work in an enjoyable field after you leave your job. Perhaps you can move to lower cost of living area/country. As the saying goes, where there’s a will there’s a way. Good luck!

  3. Cash Rebel says

    Great case study. This is a really interesting one. It’s so inspiring to see someone quite a high paying soulless job for a job worth doing! I’d choose option 2 as well. You gotta rol the dice a little or it’s not fun.

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Amen!

      But what is also inspiring, to me at least, is having the fortitude to stick it out long enough to get the stash built while not falling into the debt and lifestyle traps. 😉

  4. Brandon Curtis says

    I think an expectation of 8-12% for long-term stock market returns is a little optimistic! My analysis of historical investment returns on the S&P500 suggests that 5-7.5% is a more reasonable expectation for long-term, annualized, inflation-adjusted returns on the US stock market.

    You’re right about the massive dispersion of returns in a five-year horizon (see graph). This is probably why The Motley Fool has a blanket recommendation to avoid stocks completely for money you’ll need within five years.

    You have more than enough cash to invest to meet the minimum initial investment on multiple Vanguard funds, so you might consider manufacturing your own Target Date Fund and fine-tuning the risk/reward balance instead of accepting whatever Vanguard has already pre-rolled. If you follow Vanguard’s glide path diagram (cited in that article), they would still have you invest 50% of the money that you need in five years in stocks.

    At the end of the day, it’s all about your personal risk tolerance.

    A 529 Education Savings Plan—with yourself as both the owner and the beneficiary—is another potential option in which to invest your money short-term while you’re in school, and it has the added bonus that you’ll be avoiding capital gains on any growth of that money. Just make sure that you A) draw that account down completely before graduating or B) have plans to transfer the leftovers to a relative or to your own potential future offspring.

    You can roll the 401k over into a Traditional IRA as soon as you cease employment, and then perform partial Roth conversions over your following no-income years to keep your taxes to an absolute minimum.

    As always, be safe (don’t forget to stock an emergency fund) and have fun!

  5. Jeremy says

    To be a devil’s advocate, I’m proposing an aggressive Scenario #3:

    Don’t go to school, but do go to Latin America. 5 years is a long time to go to school for a planned career duration of 7 years, and at $80k is not cheap

    During the 5 years you would have been in school, work in the meaningful and rewarding field you mention. Network, talk to people, even volunteer to work for free to get your foot in the door. Often, the work experience you build will be more valuable than any formal education. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, etc… were college drop outs, for example

    With $267.5k invested in VTSAX (currently paying 1.91%), you’ll get income of over $5k a year in dividends. You won’t need to earn much to cover the rest of your expenses, meanwhile your capital will grow, and you’ll have $80k more seed money.

    You don’t mention if there is a significant other involved, but just as a data point my wife and I perma-traveling through Latin America (currently in Mexico) and spending about $18k/year/person. We are living high on the hog though, spending $500/month/person on food, and currently living in a 3-bedroom luxury home because we expect to have friends come visit. We could cut that spending in half if we needed to, and still be living large. If it helps, we publish all of our spending data. Perhaps it could help figure out if that $18k/year target is too high, too low, or just right

    All the best

    Jeremy

  6. Nancy says

    I really like Wade Pfau’s blog also. I highly recommend it, including past posts about what he uses for expected returns going forward (way more conservative than 8-12 %). Here’s a link that’s interesting (granted, he’s not assuming a 100% stock portfolio):
    http://wpfau.blogspot.com/2013/02/compound-interest-and-wealth.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PensionsRetirementPlanningAndEconomicsBlog+%28Wade+Pfau+-+Retirement+Researcher+Blog%29

    Also I like the Oblivious Investor blog. Here’s a link to one post about a 100% stock portfolio.
    http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/when-does-a-100-stock-portfolio-make-sense/

    Larry Swedroe thinks stocks have an expected real return of just 4.4 percent .
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57593960/returns-from-the-stock-market-what-to-expect/#postComments

    Good luck!

  7. Matt says

    When I see reader studies of young people making super high incomes I am left wondering what job they’re working and how they got into it. I’m filling in my own blanks here thinking that this guy is working 80+ hour weeks in investment banking in NYC, but I think it would be really interesting to me and a lot of other readers to know more about the path he took to get such a high income (so there’s an option to follow said path) and what exactly about his job is so soul crushing (so there’s an explicit warning of why you wouldn’t want to).

  8. Done by Forty says

    That’s great advice you’ve given. I am admittedly too conservative and would probably go with scenario #1, to guard against a 4th possibility of my investments hitting a very bad stretch while in college and losing money. School can be stressful enough without having to sell equities at a loss. But I realize the opportunity costs inherent with that approach and the smart money says to go with scenario #2.

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Nothing at all wrong with #1 and we won’t know which was the smart money until five years out. 😉

      Much better to chose that with which you are most comfortable and most likely to stick with.

  9. Rob Bertram says

    Hi, Tom!

    Are you not interested with a Roth IRA because you are above the income level? You can still contribute to a traditional IRA, and as has been pointed out, you can do the “backdoor” conversion from Traditional to Roth when your income drops to $0. More info can be found here: http://www.madfientist.com/traditional_ira_vs_roth_ira/

    Jeremy does bring up a good point that going to school for five years only to work for seven is hard to justify financially. You could be doing something else that you enjoy more. You’ve saved enough that you’re at a point where you can pick and do the things that you want to be doing. (Going to school could be one of those.) A couple more years of modest savings will get you to your FI goal assuming that your current stash is invested and growing.

    Congratulations on your path to FI!

    –Rob

  10. Dollar Flipper says

    Well that is just awesome. You have a TON of cash sitting there. I think that’s a great problem compared to everyone else living paycheck to paycheck. Congrats and good luck with your future! I bet you’ll love the new job!

  11. Tom says

    Jim et al,

    Thanks so much for your input! You’ve certainly made me feel better for taking my time in deciding how to invest. I appreciate everyone’s congrats on my savings fortitude. My coworkers, friends, and family remain mystified as to why I still don’t own a car or refuse to talk to a financial planner. Oh yeah!

    To address your questions, I’ll be moving to Argentina to study nursing. It’s a career I’ve been wanting to do for some time and the complete opposite of the dreary, abstract work I’m doing now (consultant with lots of confined, isolated middle east assignments), so I’m thrilled to have this opportunity. F-you money is glorious, my friends!

    Although my time in school is a bit lengthy relative to my planned career span, I hope to continue nursing in a very low wage/volunteer capacity while financially independent. Also, to further justify the academic expense, I simply enjoy school and student culture. Having to listen to my miserable coworkers cynically bitch about everything under the sun may have something to do with it.

    You may be curious as to which option I’ll be rolling with and I believe I’m settling on option #2 with 100% VTSAX allocation. Having learned that a five year 6% withdrawal rate won”t bring about my own personal financial apocalypse, I’m confident in moving forward with this. Perhaps most importantly, unlike other asset allocation strategies, I fully understand this approach and have appropriate expectations.

    Simply put, I’ll take the higher risk to achieve financial independence earlier and, as suggested, hedge my youth and adaptability if the market turns against me at an inconvenient time. I’m in for a wild but rewarding ride.

    Great points about the tax-advantaged accounts and I plan to do as you advise, to include the 401(k) rollover and future Roth contributions.

    Again, Jim, I really thank you for what you’re doing. I’ll keep you posted on my adventures and I look forward to future discussion on your blog!

    And, please to both Jim and the community, let me know if you have any more questions or comments! I love reading them!

    Cheers!

    Tom

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Well I for one am now even more curious as to your current profession: “consultant with lots of confined, isolated middle east assignments”

      I bet Matt from above is too! 🙂

  12. Andrés says

    One small wrinkle I’ve learned from living abroad: unless Tom makes more than the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (which will be $97,600 for 2013 and is indexed to increase with inflation) he won’t be able to contribute to his Roth IRA if he is living and working full-time outside of the United States. However, he will be able to contribute to his taxable brokerage accounts as normal.

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Thanks Andrés…

      Great input and something I didn’t know. In fact, I’ve made this conversation Addendum #1 in the post above.

      It got me doing a bit of research and I’d like to expand a bit on your comment.

      The IRS says you can contribute to a Roth IRA if, in 2013 you

      1. received taxable compensation during the year, and
      2. your modified Adjusted Gross Income is less than certain levels which are detailed here:
      http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Amount-of-Roth-IRA-Contributions-That-You-Can-Make-For-2013

      Since the first $97,600 of foreign income is excluded, unless you make more than this you wouldn’t meet the income qualification.

      However, in determining your income limit, this excludable income is added back in.

      For a single taxpayer like Tom the income limit for a Roth IRA starts at 112k and phases out thru 127k. That is between 112k and 127k you can fund part of a Roth.

      So, if Tom makes $97,600 or less. No Roth. Since the income is excluded, he doesn’t meet the earned income test.

      If Tom makes over 127k, no Roth. He is over the income limit.

      If Tom makes 100k, he could contribute $2400 to his Roth. That is his total adjusted gross income of 100k – the 97.6k exclusion = 2.4k

      If Tom were to make between 103.1k (97.6k + 5.5k) and 112k he’ll be able to fully fund his Roth at the allowed $5500. Once over 112k the amount allowed gets steadily reduced until it is gone completely over 127k.

      Whew!

      And this is why I hate writing about tax stuff! 🙂

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Yep.

      The idea is that while transferring a 401k, or IRA, to a Roth is a taxable event because Tom will have no other income in the year he does this and because the amount in the 401k is low enough, it will fall below the taxable threshold.

      It would not work transferring say a 100k account. But if he had that much he could tranfer 20k a year over his five years of no income and pay little or most likely no tax.

      Once in the Roth, it’s home (and tax) free.

  13. Simon Green says

    Great stuff! Two comments:
    The low side short-term return, based on US stock history (which will probably not be representative of the future far more globalized economy), is a lot less than 5%. Someone who invested in January 2000 had *negative* returns by end of 2004. One could argue the US stock market is poised for huge growth and 2000/2008 will not recur, but there is risk in that bet today. Just look at the volatility recently.

    Inflation has been rampant in Argentina (up to 20,000% per annum!!) and is currently running nearly 10% since about 2010. This means $16K is eventually going to ramp up to about $25K or possibly a great deal more. With this in mind, it could be more advisable to invest in an apartment in Argentina, take advantage of the inflation gains, and have local currency inflation-protected cash flow (assuming a room mate or renting it out altogether) which should elude US income taxes.

    • Marcissimo says

      As someone who regularly visits Argentina and who has considered buying real estate there, I’ll offer a couple of counterpoints about Simon’s cautions….
      1) Inflation IS high in Argentina, but the Argentine peso is also declining steeply against the US dollar (especially using the black market exchange rate). As long as Tom’s investment income is in dollars, I don’t see cause for concern. However, once out of school, if he’s earning an income in pesos, then he could end up with much less spending power than he is expecting.
      2) Investing in an apartment in Argentina isn’t an effective way to take advantage of inflation gains. Almost all real estate transactions in Argentina are done in US dollars, which means that they are relatively unaffected by inflation of the peso.

  14. Justin @ RootofGood says

    Amazing what a little money (or a quarter million in this case) can do for you. Tom can bum around Latin America, get some schooling, and have a great chance of watching his portfolio grow over time.

    We have a portfolio in the very low seven figures and hope to pull less than the historically safe 4% from it, and let the portfolio grow a little over time. My wife and I are in our 30’s and plan to live off the portfolio right now, so a 4% withdrawal rate for potentially 50-60 years might be risky.

    We aren’t averse to working a little bit to keep the withdrawal rate today in the 3% range, but, over time, we would like to rely on the portfolio to support us without a lot of risk of depleting the portfolio.

    • jlcollinsnh says

      Great plan, Justin!

      It never hurts to be careful, especially in the early years. If the market turns against you for a while you are still save. If not, you enjoy the growth and the extra money that will allow you to draw in later years.

      Well played!

      • Justin @ RootofGood says

        That’s the plan! I figure within ~10 years of retiring early, we will know whether the portfolio is taking a dangerous spiral downward or slowly growing in spite of us taking annual withdrawals.

        And the greatest odds are in favor of the portfolio growing in real terms over time if you only withdraw ~3% per year. We could actually have the problem of too much money (the horrors!).

  15. Jay Jay says

    I’ve been reading your blog for quite some time (love it, and thanks for doing it!), but this is the first time I’ve felt I might possibly add some insight.

    Since Tom’s income will be so low, his dividends and capital gains should be tax free (assuming his ex-patriot status doesn’t impact that) up to $32k or more, depending on deductions and exemptions.

    I know you usually recommend a “set it and forget it” approach to index fund investing, but it might make sense in Tom’s case to consider occasionally selling off his fund if it has experienced some gains, and then immediately buying back into it. He would of course need to calculate what amount he could sell which would still keep him in the 0% cap gain tax bracket. If he remains in a 0% tax bracket, all he’s lost is his transaction costs.

    This is sort of the opposite of a wash sale. Instead of locking in a loss, you are locking in a tax free capital gain. It also reestablishes the cost basis, so if he ends up in a higher bracket in the future, his capital gains will be less than if he hadn’t made the sale/repurchase. As far as I am aware, there is no 30 day limit for sales/repurchases that involve a gain.

  16. CWoods says

    However, when using Vanguard funds there is this glitch:

    “If you sell or exchange shares of a Vanguard fund, you will not be permitted to buy or exchange back into the same fund, in the same account, within 60 calendar days.”

    The easy way around this is to exchange from VTSAX to VFIAX (S&P 500 index fund) and back to VTSAX after 60 days… In fact, I’d be comfortable enough with VFIAX to say just leave the funds there until you are ready to harvest the profits again.

    Alternative #1
    Couldn’t he open a 2nd account and use “exchange” to sell the fund in the one account and then buy it in the other? (They do say “in the same account”, it’s quite easy to open a 2nd account, and “exchanges” are sell/buy order pairs – it won’t let you “buy” back into the fund in the same account but it should for another account.) Then when you’re ready to reset again, you just “exchange” it back to the first account.

    Alternative #2
    From Vanguard’s Frequent Trading Policy:

    However, this rule does not apply to:

    Transaction requests submitted by mail to Vanguard from shareholders who hold their accounts directly with Vanguard or through a Vanguard brokerage account. (Transaction requests submitted by fax, if otherwise permitted, are subject to the limitations.)

    He send them a certified letter in the mail stating that he wanted them to sell his shares and then immediately buy back in? In general, since you’re only doing this when there’s an appreciable increase in value, it shouldn’t matter when the transactions orders are actually executed or what the NAV price is as it would be a same day transaction – so you can’t lose anything. You just need to leave yourself a little room in case the market has a good run up while the letter is in the mail (so that you don’t go into the taxable earnings bracket) and probably want to include in the letter a minimum price required to proceed just in case the market completely tanks right before they get the letter – while you wouldn’t lose anything (same day transaction) you also don’t want to reset your cost basis to something lower than it already is.

  17. Andrea says

    It’s 2024! I would be curious if we could get an update on Tom! Is he retired now or did he continue to work after finishing his work in South America? I am assuming his network grew since we had average returns with the bull market after 2013.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *